SGLT2 Inhibitors and Bone Health: What You Need to Know About Fracture Risk

SGLT2 Inhibitors and Bone Health: What You Need to Know About Fracture Risk
1 Dec, 2025
by Trevor Ockley | Dec, 1 2025 | Health | 4 Comments

SGLT2 Inhibitor Bone Risk Assessment Tool

Assess Your Fracture Risk

This tool estimates your fracture risk based on the latest clinical data for SGLT2 inhibitors. Enter your details to see if your current medication is appropriate for your bone health profile.

When you’re managing type 2 diabetes, the goal isn’t just lowering blood sugar-it’s protecting your heart, kidneys, and overall quality of life. SGLT2 inhibitors like canagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dapagliflozin have become go-to options because they do all three. But one question keeps popping up in doctor’s offices and patient forums: Do these drugs increase your risk of breaking a bone?

Why Bone Health Matters with Diabetes Drugs

People with type 2 diabetes already have a higher chance of fractures-even if their bones look normal on a scan. High blood sugar weakens bone structure over time. Add in older age, reduced muscle mass, and nerve damage that affects balance, and falls become more likely. So when a new class of diabetes meds came out in 2013, it made sense to watch for side effects that could make things worse.

Canagliflozin (Invokana) was the first to raise red flags. In 2015, data from the CANVAS trial showed people taking it had about 26% more fractures than those on placebo. Most of these weren’t from car crashes or sports injuries-they happened when someone just stumbled while standing up or stepped off a curb. The FDA responded in 2016 by adding a warning to the label. It wasn’t just about the drug itself-it was about who was taking it. Many of those affected were older adults with low bone density or a history of falls.

Not All SGLT2 Inhibitors Are the Same

This is where things get important. The problem isn’t the whole class. It’s mostly canagliflozin, especially at the higher 300 mg dose. Studies on empagliflozin (Jardiance) and dapagliflozin (Farxiga) haven’t shown the same risk. In fact, a 2023 meta-analysis of 27 trials involving over 20,000 patients found no overall increase in fractures with SGLT2 inhibitors as a group. The pooled risk? Almost exactly the same as placebo.

Why the difference? It comes down to how each drug affects the body. Canagliflozin causes more significant bone mineral density loss-about 1% at the hip and spine over two years, compared to less than half that with empagliflozin. It also lowers estradiol levels in women by nearly 10%, which can weaken bones. It increases phosphate loss in urine, which triggers hormonal shifts that may pull calcium out of bones. And while all SGLT2 inhibitors can cause dizziness from low blood pressure, canagliflozin seems to do it a bit more often, raising fall risk.

Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin don’t show these same patterns. In head-to-head comparisons, their bone effects are either neutral or barely noticeable. That’s why the FDA only updated the label for canagliflozin-and why guidelines from the American Diabetes Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists treat them differently.

Split lab scene comparing canagliflozin's bone loss to neutral effects of other SGLT2 drugs in geometric style.

Who Should Be Worried?

If you’re a healthy 55-year-old with type 2 diabetes and no history of falls or broken bones, the risk from any SGLT2 inhibitor is likely very low. But if you’re older, have osteoporosis (T-score below -2.5), have had a fracture before, or take steroids or thyroid medicine, you need to think harder.

Here’s what endocrinologists are doing in practice:

  • Checking bone density (DXA scan) before starting canagliflozin in anyone over 65 or with known bone loss
  • Avoiding canagliflozin entirely in people with T-scores below -2.0
  • Choosing empagliflozin or dapagliflozin instead for patients with high fracture risk
  • Adding calcium and vitamin D if levels are low
  • Encouraging balance exercises and removing fall hazards at home

A 2022 survey of 347 endocrinologists found that 82% avoid canagliflozin in patients with osteoporosis. Only 34% do the same for dapagliflozin. That’s not paranoia-it’s precision.

What the Real-World Data Shows

Some doctors worry the clinical trials didn’t last long enough to catch slow bone damage. Dr. Robert Heaney, a leading bone expert, points out that most trials ran only 3-5 years. Bone loss happens over decades. But real-world data is starting to catch up.

A 2023 study in the Journal of Parathyroid Disease looked at over 100,000 Medicare patients on SGLT2 inhibitors. It found no link between empagliflozin or dapagliflozin and fractures. Even for canagliflozin, the risk was only elevated in those over 75 with prior fractures. In younger, healthier people, the numbers were nearly identical to other diabetes drugs.

And here’s something surprising: SGLT2 inhibitors might actually be safer than some other diabetes meds. A 2023 study in JAMA Network Open compared fracture rates between SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists like semaglutide. The SGLT2 group had slightly fewer fractures-by about 0.3 per 100 person-years. That’s because GLP-1 drugs cause more nausea and dizziness early on, which can lead to falls.

Geometric human figure with contrasting bone health zones in Bauhaus design, showing fall risk and balance training.

What to Do If You’re on One of These Drugs

If you’re already taking canagliflozin and haven’t had any issues, don’t panic. But do this:

  1. Ask your doctor if you’ve had a bone density scan in the last two years
  2. Review your fall history-have you tripped or fallen in the past year?
  3. Check your vitamin D level. Most people with diabetes are deficient.
  4. Consider switching to empagliflozin or dapagliflozin if you’re over 70, have osteoporosis, or have had a fracture
  5. Start balance training-simple things like standing on one foot for 30 seconds, twice a day, can reduce fall risk by up to 40%

Don’t stop your medication without talking to your doctor. The heart and kidney benefits of these drugs are real and life-saving. But you don’t have to accept a higher fracture risk if there’s a safer alternative.

The Bottom Line

SGLT2 inhibitors aren’t all created equal. Canagliflozin carries a small but real increased risk of fractures, especially in older adults with weak bones. Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin do not. The evidence now strongly supports choosing the latter for patients at risk of falls or osteoporosis. For most people, the benefits of these drugs far outweigh the risks-but only if you pick the right one.

Diabetes treatment isn’t one-size-fits-all. Your bone health matters as much as your A1c. Ask the right questions. Get the right tests. And make sure your medication fits your whole body-not just your blood sugar.

4 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Declan O Reilly

    December 2, 2025 AT 19:50

    Man, I read this whole thing and just thought - we’re treating diabetes like it’s a spreadsheet when it’s a living, breathing mess of hormones, falls, and midnight snacks. SGLT2s are cool, but no drug fixes a house full of loose rugs and a cat that chases your slippers. Bone density scans? Sure. But also, maybe just teach people to stand on one foot while brushing their teeth. Free, effective, and you won’t need a PhD to do it.

  • Image placeholder

    Conor Forde

    December 3, 2025 AT 16:49

    Ohhhh here we go. Another ‘canagliflozin is evil’ panic dressed up as science. Let me guess - the same people who think statins cause impotence and flu shots give you autism are now terrified of a drug that saves kidneys. The FDA warning? A PR stunt. Look at the actual numbers: 26% increase? That’s like saying eating toast increases your risk of being struck by lightning. Meanwhile, empagliflozin gets a free pass because it’s ‘nicer’? Please. It’s all about who funded the trial. #BigPharmaLies

  • Image placeholder

    patrick sui

    December 5, 2025 AT 03:01

    Big picture: SGLT2i = net positive for most. But the nuance here is critical. Bone loss isn’t just about BMD - it’s about muscle strength, balance, and vitamin D. I’ve seen patients on dapagliflozin with T-scores of -3.2 who never fell once because they did tai chi 3x/week and took 2000 IU D3 daily. The drug isn’t the villain - the lack of holistic care is. Also, if your doctor hasn’t checked your 25-OH vitamin D in the last year, find a new one. 🙏

  • Image placeholder

    Priyam Tomar

    December 6, 2025 AT 22:40

    Everyone’s acting like this is new info. I’ve been telling people since 2016: canagliflozin is a bone crusher. The data’s been there. What’s new is that now even the ADA admits it. But you know what’s worse? Doctors still prescribing it to 70-year-old ladies who can’t get out of a chair without holding onto furniture. If you’re over 65 and your bones are already whispering, don’t be the guy who says ‘I trust my doctor.’ Check your own T-score. Or don’t. But don’t blame me when you break your hip.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*